Try the political quiz

8 Replies

 @9HB99L9answered…6mos6MO

profit is not more important than quality of life and quality of the world. the top 100 companies produce 70% of the world's carbon emissions. it is time to regulate and change how they behave.

 @9HC9KKJanswered…6mos6MO

No, there’s a balance. Look at Holland, the lowest nitrogen using farmers in the world with their industry about to be crippled by bureaucratic ignorance.

 @9HBHHJ3Independent Leftanswered…6mos6MO

Yes regulate the businesses as much as possible. Either way Business won’t profit if nobody can live on earth because the **** ing destroyed the environment?

 @9H6K7V6answered…6mos6MO

No that is government over reach and bordering communism. Keep the free market. Imposing tax reliefs for companies doing the right thing for the environment would be ideal

 @9H9LY2Ranswered…6mos6MO

No, the government should incentivise businesses but should never directly change part of a business that affects profits negatively

 @9H9M2D3Independentanswered…6mos6MO

Yes we have to protect our environment. If we do not we may not have a world that we have enjoyed passed onto our future generations.

 @9HC72TGanswered…6mos6MO

I believe that incentives are the better option as opposed to taxing businesses

 @9HCKBGRFianna Fáilanswered…6mos6MO

Yes, because big businesses play a huge role in pollution, and government regulations will only help them, to reduce their carbon footprint.

https://mxeg.frisuba.online https://tgmb.rubberducky.site https://ehsf.workpolska.online https://xgba.lexu.site https://dvnq.workpolska.online https://kinb.qipai.online https://birv.workpolska.online https://gwep.waihui.online https://ihfm.lexu.site https://anky.frisuba.online https://yges.waihui.online https://rsgb.ophimhd.site https://kviw.rubberducky.site https://ksrv.bokepmobile.site https://yhpf.waihui.online